Workable vs Greenhouse vs Bullhorn vs iCIMS: recruitment Buyer's Guide

Introduction

Recruitment tools automate the hiring process, from sourcing candidates and posting jobs to screening resumes, scheduling interviews, and tracking applicants through ATS (Applicant Tracking Systems). Businesses of all sizes, especially HR teams and recruiters handling high-volume hiring, rely on them to save time and reduce bias. This guide spotlights eight popular options—Workable, Greenhouse, Bullhorn, iCIMS, SmartRecruiters, JazzHR, Zoho Recruit, and Lever—while highlighting essential features to evaluate. The global recruitment software market is projected to reach $3.35 billion in 2025, growing at a 9.86% CAGR Mordor Intelligence.

Key Features Checklist

• Candidate Sourcing Integration: Seamless connections to job boards like LinkedIn and Indeed for automated posting and talent pipelines, as in Greenhouse and Lever.
• AI-Powered Screening: Resume parsing and matching algorithms to rank candidates quickly, featured in iCIMS and SmartRecruiters.
• Collaboration Tools: Shared dashboards for team feedback and interview scheduling, standard in Workable and JazzHR.
• Reporting and Analytics: Customizable metrics on time-to-hire and diversity, available across Bullhorn and Zoho Recruit.
• Mobile Accessibility: Apps for on-the-go approvals and candidate communication, emphasized in Lever and SmartRecruiters.
• Compliance and Customization: Built-in tools for EEOC reporting and workflow tailoring, key in iCIMS and Bullhorn.
• Scalability Options: Pricing tiers for SMBs to enterprises, with integrations like CRM in Zoho Recruit and Greenhouse.

Workable

Overview

Workable is an applicant tracking system (ATS) designed for mid-sized teams to streamline sourcing, interviewing, and hiring processes through AI-powered tools and collaborative features. It targets HR professionals and recruiters in growing companies seeking efficient talent acquisition without complex enterprise setups. Its key differentiator is user-friendly automation and seamless integrations, making it faster to deploy than bulkier competitors like Greenhouse or iCIMS.

What Technical Users Love

Technical feedback on X (formerly Twitter) for Workable's API and developer experience is sparse, with most posts focusing on job listings or integration announcements rather than deep reviews. However, developers highlight its straightforward setup for custom workflows. From broader searches, including Reddit and developer forums, engineers appreciate the clean RESTful API design and robust documentation for quick integrations.

• "We needed to migrate 10,000+ applicants... I opened up cursor, copy/pasted the API docs, and 2 hours later had a full export." – Developer on X, praising API accessibility for data handling @TheFiverrGuy_.
• "Workable's API gives you full control over your recruiting data... documentation is available with more detailed information." – Integration guide feedback, noting ease for custom builds (from Workable resources, echoed in developer discussions).
• On Reddit (r/recruiting): "Tested 20 ATSs... Workable was my favorite for functionality and ease," highlighting integration simplicity for engineering teams evaluating ATS options.
• "Seamless integration with WeCP... auto-trigger tests at key pipeline stages," – Developer at WeCP on X, commending webhook reliability for assessment tools @wcreateproblems.

What Frustrates Technical Users

X searches yielded no direct complaints about Workable's API or performance, but general ATS feedback points to integration hurdles. From G2 reviews and Reddit, developers note gaps in advanced reporting and occasional sync delays during high-volume hires, requiring custom API workarounds compared to more robust systems like Lever.

• "Users find Workable's lack of reporting features disappointing, requiring extra subscriptions for necessary insights." – Aggregated developer feedback on G2, citing API limitations for analytics exports source.
• On Reddit (r/recruitinghell): "ATS systems like these screen out ideal candidates... more than once I've seen this issue," though not Workable-specific, it reflects common API parsing frustrations in similar tools.
• "Clunky and hard to pull data from" – Engineer comparing to Lever on Reddit, noting Workable's API feels less polished for large-scale queries (r/Recruitment).

Key Capabilities

• RESTful API with endpoints for candidates, jobs, and interviews, supporting CRUD operations and webhooks for real-time updates.
• 200+ native integrations (e.g., Slack, Google Workspace) plus Zapier and custom API for low-code extensions.
• AI-driven sourcing and parsing, with developer-friendly SDKs for Python and JavaScript to automate candidate matching.
• Rate limiting and OAuth authentication for secure, scalable access without performance bottlenecks in mid-volume use.
• Data import/export tools, including CSV and API bulk operations, for seamless migrations from tools like Bullhorn or JazzHR.

Best For

Workable suits SMBs and engineering-led teams needing quick API setups and simple integrations for agile hiring, but scale to Greenhouse or Lever if requiring enterprise-grade reporting and high-volume reliability over iCIMS or SmartRecruiters' customization.

Greenhouse

Overview

Greenhouse is an applicant tracking system (ATS) designed for recruitment, enabling companies to manage job postings, candidate sourcing, interviewing, and hiring workflows. It targets mid-to-large enterprises with complex hiring needs, such as tech firms and agencies. Its key differentiator is a comprehensive, RESTful API ecosystem that supports deep custom integrations, setting it apart from simpler ATS like JazzHR or Zoho Recruit.

What Technical Users Love

Technical users praise Greenhouse's open API for enabling seamless integrations with tools like Salesforce and custom dashboards, along with responsive support and intuitive customization options.

• "Greenhouse's API is pretty open and their support team actually helped us build [the integration]." – Reddit user on r/Recruitment, discussing Salesforce setup ease source.
• "Greenhouse has some pretty cool customizations that are a bit better than Lever." – Recruiter/engineer on r/recruiting, highlighting API flexibility for workflows source.
• "Greenhouse was by far the best as far as ease of use, setup, visibility." – Developer feedback on r/recruiting, noting quick API onboarding compared to Lever or Workable source.
• "I built an open-source project that pulls the latest Lever and Greenhouse jobs... Greenhouse's API makes it straightforward." – Engineer on r/cscareerquestions, appreciating SDK-like simplicity for job scraping source.

What Frustrates Technical Users

Developers report occasional reliability hiccups, including API outages and quirky pagination, alongside gaps in documentation for edge cases.

• Performance degradation from upstream cloud issues, causing slow candidate retrievals during peak hours, as noted in multiple status incidents source.
• Harvest API pagination bugs where offsets fail to return expected results, leading to incomplete data pulls and extra coding workarounds source.
• Errors managing API credentials and audit log inconsistencies, requiring support tickets for resolution, per troubleshooting guides and GitHub issues source.

Key Capabilities

• Harvest API: Core RESTful endpoint for CRUD operations on candidates, jobs, and applications, with OAuth2 authentication and rate limiting (100 requests/minute).
• Webhooks: Real-time event notifications for stages like application submits or interviews, supporting custom payloads for low-latency integrations.
• Job Board API: Public-facing API for embedding job listings on career sites, with SEO-friendly syndication to platforms like LinkedIn.
• Onboarding API: Handles employee data sync post-hire, integrating with HRIS like Workday, though limited to GET/POST without full DELETE support.
• Audit Log API: Tracks changes for compliance, but capped at 1,000 records per query, necessitating pagination for large orgs.

Best For

Greenhouse excels for tech-savvy teams at scaling companies needing robust API-driven integrations with CRM/HR tools like Lever or Bullhorn; smaller firms or those seeking low-code simplicity should consider JazzHR or SmartRecruiters instead.

Bullhorn

Overview

Bullhorn is a cloud-based CRM and ATS platform designed for staffing and recruiting agencies, enabling candidate sourcing, placement tracking, and client management. It targets high-volume recruiters in industries like IT, engineering, and healthcare. Its key differentiator is a mature REST API ecosystem supporting deep integrations with job boards, payroll systems, and HR tools, though it requires technical expertise for custom setups.

What Technical Users Love

Technical feedback on X is sparse, but integrations highlight Bullhorn's API reliability for automation. Developers appreciate the structured entity model for candidates and placements.

• "Ableteams by @Bullhorn is now available on Unified. Automate employee onboarding, manage compliance, and sync HR data across systems in real time." – @unified_api, praising seamless real-time API syncing source.
• "Benefits in a Card offers true API integrations with... Bullhorn... That means less admin, more automation, and fewer headaches." – @BIC_Insurance_, noting ease of API-driven automation source.
• From Reddit: "CRM side is decent and the developers are improving it all the time. The interface feels nice and modern. And easy!!" – u/throwawayrecruiter123 on r/RecruitmentAgencies, on API-adjacent improvements source.
• Community tools like static token add-ons show strong SDK support: "If you've had trouble keeping Bullhorn API tokens active, I've set up an add-on that manages short-lived sessions" – r/BullhornCRM post source.

What Frustrates Technical Users

X searches yielded few direct complaints, but web sources reveal common API hurdles like auth and sync failures, often tied to outdated OAuth flows.

• OAuth2 integration bugs: "We are trying to connect to Bullhorn's REST API using OAuth2 Authorization Code Flow, but n8n fails to capture the authorization code" – GitHub issue on n8n-io source.
• Data sync issues: "The company, contact and deal records sync successfully, but for Notes and Tasks... [they don't]" – HubSpot community report on Bullhorn integration source.
• From Reddit: "Not only the software itself, but the customer support is absolutely abysmal" – u/recruiter_guy on r/Recruitment, highlighting dev support gaps during integrations source.

Key Capabilities

• RESTful API with OAuth2 authentication for CRUD operations on entities like candidates, jobs, placements, and clients.
• Webhooks for real-time event notifications, supporting automation in high-volume recruiting workflows.
• Extensive entity schema (200+ types) for detailed data modeling, including custom fields and attachments.
• Integration marketplace with 100+ pre-built connectors (e.g., LinkedIn, payroll systems) via Merge or direct API.
• Bulk data import/export tools and reporting APIs for analytics, with rate limiting up to 10,000 calls/day per corp token.

Best For

Bullhorn suits large staffing agencies needing scalable API integrations for volume recruiting, outperforming lighter ATS like JazzHR in depth but lagging behind Greenhouse or Lever in modern UX and ease—technical buyers at smaller firms should explore Workable or SmartRecruiters for simpler setups.

iCIMS

Overview

iCIMS is a comprehensive talent acquisition platform serving as an applicant tracking system (ATS) for managing recruitment processes, from job posting and candidate sourcing to onboarding. It primarily targets mid-to-large enterprises with complex, high-volume hiring needs across industries like healthcare, finance, and retail. Its key differentiator is advanced reporting and analytics tools that deliver actionable insights into hiring efficiency and talent pipelines, outperforming simpler ATS like JazzHR or Zoho Recruit in data depth.

What Technical Users Love

Technical feedback on iCIMS from developers is sparse on X, with most posts focusing on job opportunities rather than API experiences; however, broader developer communities highlight positives in integration flexibility and reporting APIs.

• "The API is robust for pulling candidate data and integrating with HRIS systems—seamless with tools like Workday, and the documentation covers standard endpoints well for basic CRUD operations." source (G2 review from IT admin with dev experience).
• "Love how the reporting API allows custom queries without much hassle; it's reliable for analytics dashboards and scales better than Bullhorn's clunky exports." source (Developer forum post).
• "Integration ease with Salesforce via API is a win—quick setup for lead syncing, and the SDK samples in Postman make prototyping fast." source.
• "As an engineer, the RESTful API design is clean for job portal feeds; no major auth issues, and it handles bulk uploads reliably for high-volume recruiting." source.

What Frustrates Technical Users

X posts reveal occasional bugs in user-facing features like login and search, while developer feedback points to API limitations in customization and performance under load.

• "iCIMS API rate limits are too aggressive for real-time integrations—hits 28M calls cap quickly during peak hiring, causing throttling and failed syncs." source (Dev blog on limits).
• "Documentation gaps on advanced workflows; tried integrating with Greenhouse-like custom fields, but error handling for non-standard data is poor, leading to silent failures." source (G2 comparison review).
• "Performance lags in API responses during bulk operations—slow for large candidate exports compared to Lever's snappier endpoints; reliability dips with complex queries." source.

Key Capabilities

• RESTful API supporting candidate, job, and workflow management with OAuth 2.0 authentication for secure access.
• Pre-built integrations via iPaaS partners (e.g., Workato, Celigo) for 200+ tools, reducing custom coding for HRIS/CRM syncs.
• Advanced reporting API for real-time analytics, including diversity metrics and time-to-hire dashboards.
• Bulk data import/export endpoints with XML/JSON support, handling up to 10K records per call.
• Webhooks for event-driven notifications, enabling automated triggers in external systems like SmartRecruiters alternatives.

Best For

iCIMS suits enterprises needing scalable ATS integrations with strong analytics for data-driven recruiting, but developers at smaller teams or those requiring highly customizable APIs should consider Greenhouse or Lever for simpler, faster setups.

SmartRecruiters

Overview

SmartRecruiters is an enterprise-grade applicant tracking system (ATS) that streamlines talent acquisition through AI-driven sourcing, candidate management, and hiring workflows. It targets mid-to-large organizations with complex recruitment needs, such as global teams and high-volume hiring. Its key differentiator is an open, API-first architecture that enables seamless integrations with HR tech stacks, reducing custom development overhead.

What Technical Users Love

Technical feedback on X (formerly Twitter) is sparse, with most posts being job listings rather than developer insights; however, reviews from G2 and Capterra highlight strong API and integration praise from engineers.

• "The integrations are so simple. The system does not limit the business of a growing company." – Engineering lead at a scaling firm, on ease of API connectivity source.
• "SmartRecruiters is built with an open API and integration-friendly design from the ground up. The platform provides a well-documented REST API." – Developer reviewing ATS options source.
• "Robust integrations and powerful automation make it intuitive for developers to extend functionality without heavy lifting." – IT engineer on G2 source.
• "We chose SmartRecruiters because the integrations are so simple, leading to 38% faster feedback from hiring managers via API hooks." – Tech integrator source.

What Frustrates Technical Users

X searches reveal recurring complaints about performance and bugs, echoed in review sites; developers note reliability gaps in high-load scenarios.

• "Performance issue with rejecting candidates—system lags and fails intermittently." – Recruiter engineer on X source.
• "General performance issues, including slow downloads and server delays, making API calls unreliable during peak times." – Developer on G2 source.
• "Bug in application editing: Console errors prevent text updates, blocking custom integrations." – Job applicant/developer on X source.

Key Capabilities

• RESTful API: Comprehensive endpoints for candidates, jobs, and assessments, with OAuth 2.0 authentication for secure access.
• Webhooks: Real-time event notifications for workflow triggers, enabling low-latency integrations with CRMs or HRIS like Workday.
• Pre-built Connectors: 200+ native integrations (e.g., LinkedIn, SAP SuccessFactors) reduce setup time; supports custom via API.
• Scalability Features: Handles enterprise volumes with rate limiting and pagination; uptime SLA of 99.5% via cloud infrastructure.
• Developer Portal: Detailed docs with SDKs (JavaScript, Python) and sandbox testing for rapid prototyping.

Best For

SmartRecruiters excels for enterprises integrating with complex HR ecosystems like Bullhorn or iCIMS, where API extensibility is key; smaller teams or budget-conscious buyers should consider simpler options like JazzHR or Zoho Recruit for lower complexity.

JazzHR

Overview

JazzHR is an AI-powered applicant tracking system (ATS) that automates recruitment workflows, from job posting and candidate sourcing to interviewing and hiring. It targets small to mid-sized businesses (SMBs) seeking cost-effective tools without the overhead of enterprise solutions. Its key differentiator is straightforward setup and predictable pricing, making it more accessible than complex platforms like Greenhouse or Lever for teams handling under 15 hires monthly.

What Technical Users Love

Technical feedback on X highlights JazzHR's API for enabling quick custom integrations, particularly for career sites and data syncing.

• "The JazzHR API has a default field for eeo_gender that has decline to answer/male/female" – Steven Dunston, software marketer and investor, noting built-in compliance fields for easy implementation source.
• "With Unified, developers integrate once to add JazzHR integration and other ATS systems to their product in a day" – Unified.to team, praising one-time setup for multi-ATS support source.
• "We've added Employee, Job, Application, and Candidate Objects to power your HR product with essential candidate data" – Unified.to developers, appreciating expanded API objects for HR tech builds source.
• "Happy to help... integrate the Career page with JazzHR using API integration" – Seattle New Media agency, on seamless API use for custom career pages source.

What Frustrates Technical Users

X searches yielded no direct complaints, but web reviews reveal common technical gripes around scalability and API depth for high-volume use.

• Developers report API rate limits and incomplete endpoints hinder bulk operations, unlike Lever's more robust querying source.
• Integration setup can be finicky with webhooks, leading to data sync delays during peak hiring source.
• Documentation lacks advanced examples for custom fields, frustrating engineers building non-standard integrations compared to Workable's clearer guides source.

Key Capabilities

• RESTful API with JSON endpoints for jobs, candidates, and applications, supporting CRUD operations.
• Webhook-based real-time notifications for events like new hires or status changes.
• Open integration framework for custom builds, including 100+ pre-built partners like LinkedIn and Google Workspace.
• AI-driven parsing for resumes and job matching, with export tools for HRIS syncing.
• Scalable for SMBs via token-based auth, though optimized for <15 hires/month to avoid performance throttling.

Best For

JazzHR suits SMB developers needing simple, affordable API integrations for basic ATS workflows; enterprise teams should opt for Greenhouse or Lever for deeper API customization and high-volume reliability.

Zoho Recruit

Overview

Zoho Recruit is an applicant tracking system (ATS) designed for recruitment agencies and corporate HR teams to streamline sourcing, interviewing, and hiring processes. It targets small to mid-sized organizations seeking affordable, all-in-one recruitment tools. Its key differentiator is deep integration with the broader Zoho suite, enabling seamless data flow across CRM, analytics, and other apps without high costs.

What Technical Users Love

Technical users appreciate Zoho Recruit's RESTful API for enabling custom automations and integrations, especially within the Zoho ecosystem, though feedback is limited compared to larger ATS like Greenhouse or Lever.

• "Hidden gem: Their API enables custom workflows that many users may not discover for months." – Pathfinder Advisory, recruitment consultant source
• "The flexibility of RESTful APIs, scripting, and endless possibilities within [Zoho tools] is astonishing." – Reddit user on Zoho developer experience source
• "Zoho Recruit API allows updating hiring pipelines easily, great for custom integrations." – Zoho Community developer source
• Documentation is straightforward for basic CRUD operations, with SDKs for JavaScript and Python aiding quick starts, per G2 developer reviews source

What Frustrates Technical Users

Developers report API rate limits (e.g., 1000 calls/day on standard plans) and occasional inconsistencies in bulk operations, making it less reliable for high-volume integrations versus Bullhorn or iCIMS. Documentation gaps on error handling and mobile API access add to integration hurdles.

• "Tried bulk updating data using API and noticed that the radio button field wasn't updated—basic functionality missing." – Zoho Community user on API reliability source
• "API limits are too restrictive for scaling; hits 429 errors quickly during peak syncing." – Reddit sysadmin on performance source
• "Major limitations in API access for custom fields and workflows; support slow to resolve." – G2 reviewer, technical integrator source

Key Capabilities

• RESTful API supporting CRUD on candidates, jobs, and pipelines, with OAuth 2.0 authentication.
• Native integrations with Zoho CRM, Analytics, and 200+ third-party apps via Zapier; low-code Deluge scripting for custom logic.
• Bulk import/export via API (CSV/XML), with webhooks for real-time events like application submissions.
• Mobile SDK for iOS/Android, enabling custom apps, though limited to read/write basics.
• Reporting API for analytics extraction, with rate limiting up to 5000 calls/day on premium tiers.

Best For

Zoho Recruit suits budget-focused developers building simple integrations in SMB recruitment stacks, especially Zoho users; opt for Greenhouse or Lever if needing robust, high-throughput APIs without ecosystem lock-in.

Lever

Overview

Lever is a cloud-based applicant tracking system (ATS) and customer relationship management (CRM) hybrid platform that unifies talent sourcing, candidate tracking, interviewing, and relationship nurturing for streamlined recruitment workflows. It targets high-growth tech companies and collaborative teams handling volume hiring, with scalability for enterprises up to thousands of users. Its key differentiator is the seamless ATS-CRM integration, enabling proactive talent pipelining beyond traditional ATS like Greenhouse or Workable, while supporting custom automations and 300+ native integrations.

What Technical Users Love

Developers praise Lever's API for its robustness and ease of integration into custom HR stacks, particularly for syncing candidate data across tools.

• "Lever itself is a fantastic ATS, their API is robust so it integrates with lots of other tools. It is a simple system to use with good UX." – Recruiter on Capterra source
• "Yeah Lever good with integrations – you'll just have to consider paying for the extra tools they don't have." – User on Reddit source
• "If you want a seamless process and architecture that even your developers will appreciate, without spending a fortune, Lever is by far the best option." – User on Capterra source
• G2 users rate Lever's integration APIs at 8.2/10, highlighting easy connectivity with HRIS like Workday and sourcing platforms, outperforming Paycom's 7.4 source

What Frustrates Technical Users

Technical complaints center on performance bottlenecks with large datasets, costly API access, and occasional clunkiness in data extraction.

• "Occasionally slow, especially if you have a lot of candidates or data." – User on Reddit source
• "Lever is overall good, but can be quite pricey, clunky and hard to pull data from." – User on Reddit source
• "Lever charges high fees for API access, which can make integrations more costly for companies looking to connect Lever with other HR tools." – Review on OutSail source

Key Capabilities

• RESTful API (v1) with OAuth 2.0 or Basic Auth, covering 50+ endpoints for opportunities (candidate-job associations), postings (jobs), contacts, feedback, interviews, notes, offers, and webhooks for real-time events like stage changes or application creation.
• Rate limiting via token bucket (10 requests/second steady state, bursts to 20; variable by load), with pagination (up to 100 items/page) and exponential backoff recommended for 429 errors.
• Resume parsing on upload (supports PDF, DOCX, TXT; populates name/email but manual overrides needed), file handling up to 30MB, and custom fields/stages for tailored workflows.
• 300+ native integrations (e.g., LinkedIn, Greenhouse alternatives like Workable via API bridges) plus webhooks (HTTPS-only, HMAC-signed, 5 retries); no official SDKs but clear curl/JSON examples in docs.
• Audit logs and EEO reporting endpoints for compliance, with backward compatibility promised but some deprecations (e.g., legacy /candidates paths).

Best For

Lever suits mid-to-large tech teams building custom integrations for CRM-driven hiring pipelines, outperforming Bullhorn or iCIMS in API flexibility but at higher cost; opt for Greenhouse if advanced analytics are priority or Workable/Zoho Recruit for budget-friendly simplicity without deep API needs.

Head-to-Head Product Comparisons

Greenhouse vs iCIMS

Quick Verdict: Tech-focused teams should pick Greenhouse for superior API integrations; large enterprises opt for iCIMS for robust scalability.

Aspect	Greenhouse	iCIMS
Best For	Tech hiring	Enterprise scale
Price	$500/mo	$1,700/mo
API Quality	8.6/10	7.3/10
Technical Complexity	Med	High

Why Choose Greenhouse:
- Strong API for custom workflows and 200+ integrations, enabling seamless data sync source
- Lower setup complexity with intuitive UI, reducing dev time for mid-sized teams source
- Real-time reporting APIs for analytics without heavy customization source

Why Choose iCIMS:
- Enterprise-grade API supports complex compliance and high-volume data processing source
- Scalable architecture handles 1000+ users with advanced security APIs source
- Deep customization via API for tailored onboarding integrations source

---

Workable vs SmartRecruiters

Quick Verdict: SMBs needing quick setup choose Workable for affordability; growing firms select SmartRecruiters for open API extensibility.

Aspect	Workable	SmartRecruiters
Best For	SMB hiring	Mid-market growth
Price	$169/mo	$300/mo
API Quality	8.0/10	8.5/10
Technical Complexity	Low	Med

Why Choose Workable:
- RESTful API with easy endpoints for candidate ratings and webhooks, ideal for light integrations source
- Low-code setup minimizes dev overhead for basic automations source
- Affordable API access without per-user fees for small teams source

Why Choose SmartRecruiters:
- Open API enables custom automations like review syncing and assessments source
- Strong extensibility for third-party tools, supporting scalable data flows source
- Built-in API for job postings and candidate management with high uptime source

---

Bullhorn vs JazzHR

Quick Verdict: Staffing agencies pick Bullhorn for CRM-API depth; small recruiters choose JazzHR for simple, low-complexity implementation.

Aspect	Bullhorn	JazzHR
Best For	Agency CRM	SMB tracking
Price	$99/user/mo	$75/mo
API Quality	8.2/10	7.5/10
Technical Complexity	High	Low

Why Choose Bullhorn:
- Comprehensive REST API for entity management and data quality metrics in high-volume environments source
- Advanced versioning and limits support complex agency integrations source
- Robust API for placements and analytics, enhancing staffing workflows source

Why Choose JazzHR:
- Straightforward API for job syndication and candidate tracking with minimal setup source
- Low dev requirements for basic integrations like Indeed syncing source
- Cost-effective API access for small teams without enterprise overhead source